Thursday, May 16, 2013

ZARA - IT for Fast Fashion


Problem/Issue Statement
Rapidly growing retail clothing chain Zara is facing a problem of increased business risk caused by use of a DOS operating system. This system is no longer being supported by Microsoft since 2003. The heads of IT for Inditex, a multinational clothing retailer and manufacturer, are faced with a decision whether to upgrade the operating system and POS terminals.
The scope of the problem includes all Inditex operated stores (1,558 stores in 45 countries) of which nearly 550 were part of Zara chain. While having about a third of the company’s stores, Zara generated almost three quarters of the group’s sales. Many symptoms of the problems the company is experiencing include: lack of operating system support, risk of inability to upgrade machines that will not be compatible with DOS, inability to look up or instantly verify inventory in group’s stores, inability to sell clothes over the Internet, inefficiencies in store ordering and return processing, and no reliable inventory information. Furthermore, one of the decision makers appears to have a personal stake in the continuation of current state as he wrote most of the POS application and appears to be reluctant to change.

Situation Assessment
Zara is currently using point-of-sale terminal (POS) system that appears to be behind current technology. The system is reliable and very simple to operate but it runs on DOS, which is no longer supported by Microsoft.  IS department wrote their own accounting software as well as application that supported ordering, fulfillment, and manufacturing. The hardware vendor supplying Zara could upgrade their machines or some peripherals making them incompatible with the DOS system. This would prevent Zara from opening new stores.  Such problem could be detrimental to the chain’s success as the group opens on average one store per day across the world and ample growth still existed in the current markets. One of the factors that contributed to Zara’s success is the fact that they managed to respond to demands of target customers, who were young, fashion-conscious city dwellers, very quickly. The company did virtually no advertising spending - only 0.3% of revenue as compared to competitors who spent 3-4% on advertising. The company allocated more spending to its stores selecting prime retail locations. While Zara’s vertically integrated manufacturing operations enables constant introduction of new items as well as short lead times, the company was unable to take advantage of all distribution channels.  The company did not sell clothes over the Internet as the distribution centers were not configured for picking small orders and shipping them to consumers as well as due to the fact that handling returns of merchandise bought online was complicated.  Store managers determined replenishment quantities for their inventory by walking around the store and determining what has been selling by counting garments and talking to dales people – a time consuming and ineffective process. Store personnel could not look up their inventory balances on any in-store computer and was unable to check their inventory in any other way than calling the store directly. Store sales were transmitted daily, at end of business day, using a modem connected to one of the store’s POS terminals. The inventory balance was theoretical rather than actual, theft, damage and other losses would further make a theoretical inventory a poor reflection of reality. Stores used PDAs for ordering and also for tasks such as handling garment returns to distribution center and transmitting information from headquarters to all stores

List of Plausible Alternative Courses of Action and Evaluation of Alternatives
The IT leadership of Zara needs to consider the following solutions:
1) Continue using the current system and platform since it has not been causing any troubles and is very simple to operate. The vendor assured Zara that, although the company is its only customer using the ancient operating system, they will not make any drastic changes to the POS’s.  
Selecting this option is easy for the company and does not provide for any additional spending. This solution, or should I say lack thereof, is very short-sighted and does not address the problems the company is facing. To the contrary, it makes the situation and future assessment even riskier.
2) Purchase a number of current terminals so that store growth can be temporarily accommodated while the company ports the POS application to new OS such as Windows, UNIX, or Linux.
This option could allow for additional functionality and address part of the problem. Zara would be covered in the event of sudden loss of support from the vendor and work on more permanent solution. Pursuing this option would take the company a step further but will not eliminate the symptoms or provide efficiencies necessary to improve the process.
3) Research and implement a new operating system, purchase new POS units and application compatible with the new system as well as and take the opportunity to build new capabilities into the software.   
This option would require potentially significant capital investment to implement (if we consider 1,558 the company will spend over a million euros on OS, around eight million on hardware, close to four hundred thousand on connectivity, nine million on programming, and about one hundred thousand euros on installation time per store) . This option will also complicate the current simplistic IT infrastructure. IT would have to be trained on application and installation of new systems. The IT department may need to increase its headcount to accommodate for additional assistance needed to be provided to various personnel, including store managers.  
Despite the increased cost if implementation, and possibly maintenance, the company’s problem would be fully addressed. The company would realize efficiencies in its store operations (managers would no longer need to use PDAs to complete returns or place orders, which are very time consuming).  An updated POS application could easily incorporate additional functionality, allowing store personnel to use larger screen, keyboard, and mouse to quickly execute returns. Modern POS terminals could accommodate more sophisticated capabilities, especially networks within company. Every location could know the theoretical inventory of all SKUs, as well as the theoretical inventory in all other stores. This would allow stores to request transfers from one another online, eliminating the need for phone calls to see if an item is in stock.  

Recommendation
Based on the assessment of the risk and potential future economic benefits, I believe that the logical recommendation would be to purchase enough POS to support the company’s growth while working on selection and implementation of a new OS. Nevertheless, it is my assessment that the company should go for more permanent, quality, and sustainable solution that will bring all parts of the system up to speed and I therefore recommend that Zara needs to invest not only in the new operating system but also take the opportunity to upgrade its POS terminal network. As stated above, this will address all symptoms of the problem as well as the problem itself. It will improve the overall quality of data processing and create efficiencies at the stores and in inventory management. It could also allow the company to expand to other selling channels (Internet).

Presentation
Working on a presentation, I would ensure to clearly state the current process, highlight the inefficiencies (no inventory verification, calling stores to check items, difficulties in ordering and processing returns) and the compare them to improvements associated with implementation of the new OS and replacement of POS terminals. Since I am very uncomfortable with the concept of theoretical inventory level – I find it very difficult to accept that a company can be profitable and successful relying on theoretical data as opposed on inventory system that provides actual inventory level with certain allowance for theft or damaged goods. I would also recommend mentioning the improved financial information.
No company can exist without its customers. While clothing offered by Zara is trendy and fashionable, it is of rather low quality. Being a customer, if I go to the store, cannot find a side and need to wait longer than just a few minutes for a salesperson to tell me whether I can get it in another store, after repeating this experience twice, I will not go back to the store. It is worth to highlight that the solution will also improve customer experience.
I would also try to find information about competition – how far behind is Zara with their ancient technology? How does the current situation pay in terms of competitive advantage? And finally, no sales on-line? This has got to change! 

No comments:

Post a Comment